Videos to show You why you Should vote for Ron Paul

PROOF PEOPLE!!! HIS SUPPORTERS ARE COLLECTIVELY COMING TOGETHER~!!

(Amplified Volume) Obama Caught on Hot Mic Admitting Election Fraud

Rick Santorum Tells AIPAC Obama ‘Turned His Back on the People of Israel’

Rick Santorum Tells AIPAC Obama ‘Turned His Back on the People of Israel’: CLEVELAND – Instead of shaking hands outside polling places in Ohio or Tennessee today, Rick Santorum warned a Super Tuesday audience at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington D.C., of the dangers of a nuclear Iran and accused President Obama of doing...

Official defends 'lethal force' against US citizens

US Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday defended the government's use of "lethal force," even against American citizens abroad, as part of the effort to protect the nation against terror attacks.

The speech marked the first time a senior US official has publicly justified in legal terms the drone attacks that are believed to have killed at least three US citizens on foreign soil in recent months, including key Al-Qaeda figure Anwar al-Awlaqi.

"Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack," Holder said in a speech at a law school in Chicago.

"In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force."

Holder said there were circumstances under which "an operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a US citizen who is a senior operational leader of Al-Qaeda or associated forces, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans, would be lawful."

Such circumstances included that a thorough review had determined the individual posed "an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States" and that "capture is not feasible."

Thirdly, the "operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles," Holder told the audience at the Northwestern University School of Law.

"Some have called such operations 'assassinations.' They are not... assassinations are unlawful killings," Holder said.

"Our legal authority is not limited to the battlefield in Afghanistan... We are at war with a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country," he added.

"Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats." Civil rights groups have cried foul since the killing of Awlaqi in Yemen in September in a US raid.

Some argued it was illegal for the US military to kill an American citizen on the battlefield, following no attempt to indict him. US intelligence officials believed Awlaqi was linked to a US army major charged with shooting dead 13 people in 2009 in Fort Hood, Texas, and to a Nigerian student accused of trying to blow up a US airliner on December 25, 2009.

President Barack Obama said in September that Awlaqi's killing was a "major blow" to Al-Qaeda's Yemeni branch, and marked "another significant milestone in the broader effort to defeat Al-Qaeda and its affiliates."

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) last month filed a lawsuit seeking the release of documents authorizing targeted drone strikes, such as the one on Awlaqi.

US citizen Samir Khan was killed in the same attack on Awlaqi, and Awlaqi's US-born teenage son was killed in October in a separate suspected US air strike in Yemen.

Ron Paul in Michigan, Sold Out!

Obama Seeks 28 Percent Corporate Tax Rate

By JIM KUHNHENN
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is proposing to cut the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent and wants an even lower effective rate for manufacturers, a senior administration official says, as the White House lays down an election-year marker in the debate over tax policy.

In turn, corporations would have to give up dozens of loopholes and subsidies that they now enjoy. Corporations with overseas operations would also face a minimum tax on their foreign earnings.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Wednesday was to detail aspects of Obama's proposed overhaul of the corporate tax system, a plan the president outlined in general terms in his State of the Union speech last month.

Chances of accomplishing such change in the tax system are slim in a year dominated mostly with presidential and congressional elections. But for Obama, the proposal is part of a larger tax plan that is central to his re-election strategy.

The corporate tax plan dovetails with Obama's call for raising taxes on millionaires and maintaining current rates on individuals making $200,000 or less.

The 35 percent nominal corporate tax rate is the highest in the world after Japan. But deductions, credits and exemptions allow many corporations to pay taxes at a much lower rate.

Under the framework proposed by the administration, the rate cuts, closed loopholes and the minimum tax on overseas earning would result in no increase to the deficit.

That means that many businesses that slip through loopholes or enjoy subsidies and pay an effective tax rate that is substantially less than the 35 percent corporate tax could end up paying more under Obama's plan. Others, however, would pay less while some would simply benefit from a more simplified system.

The official said the Obama plan aims to help U.S. businesses, especially manufacturers who face strong international competition. Obama's plan would lower the effective rate for manufacturers to 25 percent while emphasizing development of clean energy systems. The administration official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe what the administration will do.

The New York Times first reported details of the plan in its online edition early Wednesday.

Many members of both parties have said they favor overhauling the nation's individual and corporate tax systems, which they complain have rates that are too high and are riddled with too many deductions.

The corporate tax debate has made its way into the presidential contest. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has called for a 25 percent rate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., would cut the corporate tax rate to 12.5 percent, and former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., would exempt domestic manufacturers from the corporate tax and halve the top rate for other businesses.

While Obama has been promoting various aspects of his economic agenda in personal appearances and speeches, the decision to leave the corporate tax plan to the Treasury Department to unveil signaled its lower priority. What's more, the administration's framework leaves much for Congress to decide — a deliberate move by the administration to encourage negotiations but which also doesn't subject the plan to detailed scrutiny.

Obama's plan is not as ambitious as a House Republican proposal that would lower the corporate rate to 25 percent. Still, Obama has said corporate tax rates are too high and has proposed eliminating tax breaks for American companies that move jobs and profits overseas. He also has proposed giving tax breaks to U.S. manufacturers, to firms that return jobs to this country and to companies that relocate to some communities that have lost big employers.

Geithner told a House committee last week that the administration wants to create more incentives for corporations to invest in the United States.

"We want to bring down the rate, and we think we can, to a level that's closer to the average of that of our major competitors," Geithner told the House Ways and Means Committee.

White House economic adviser Gene Sperling has advocated a minimum tax on global profits. Currently many corporations do not invest overseas profits in the United States to avoid the 35 percent tax rate.

___ Associated Press writer Alan Fram contributed to this report.

Today I am Stating Publicly, My Candidacy For The Office Of Mayor

Today I am announcing that I will be running for Mayor, In the city of Stockton, California. This will mark my 4th year living in stockton, the All-American City. I fell in Love with this port-side town while I was commuting here from Manteca during my years at Delta College. My First Semester at the school, I was privileged enough to sign up for a psychology class with Dr. Blanchard. She was a fiesty lil-Oriental Lady, who had a dictatorial image about the way she taught that seems almost enriched somehow. Well I learned a lot from her, especially the social life of a socialite. She asked me to be a busboy at a reception she was holding for Dennis Cardoza, A District Representative in the 18th district of California. I agreed to participate, and help set the tables and break them down afterwards. Going to a Congressional Dinner, held by the wealthiest patrons in our surrounding areas. And did they know how to Party. There were Cases of wine from all the local grower's, Corona's, New-York Steaks, Caviar, and the list goes on, it wasn't the nicest event I've partaken in, but definitely the funnest. I met the Congressman on the Casino side of the Boat, where he asked me to join him in playing roulette, and later taught me how to play Craps. What happens in Stockton, Stays in Stockton, Really this was a charity event, so it was all fun and games. This is what got my interest focused on public office, politics, and the key issues that take away from what moral standards we still see today. After soaking up everything around me for the past four years, and not changing my set core values, I believe I am ready to take on these challenges that are still ahead. I decided to run for the office of Mayor this year, because I am fed up with what we are being told. I want accountability from these elected officials that were carelessly taking our Country Joyriding with not a care in the world.

Poll: Ron Paul Most Favorable Republican Candidate

Poll: Ron Paul Most Favorable Republican Candidate I agree with this Article, which states Ron Paul is the more favorable Republican Candidate. Not Only Limited to one party, he's the best candidate for the job period. When he participates in the Debates, he is clearly the most intelligent person in the room.

Ron Paul Wins Poll, Yet Gets No Metion

Dr. Ron Paul; His Take On Taxes

The power to tax is the power to destroy, which is why Ron Paul will never support higher taxes.

Our national debt is currently over $14 trillion, with the government spending nearly $2 trillion more per year than it collects. The American people should not have to pay for Washington’s reckless and out-of-control appetite for debt.

High taxes stifle innovation, prevent saving, destroy production, crush the middle class and the poor, and discourage investment. Every American is entitled to the fruits of his labor, especially during these tough economic times.

Lowering taxes will leave you more money to take care of yourself and your family, and it will allow businesses greater opportunities to hire new workers, increase current salaries, and expand their companies.

As President, Ron Paul will support a Liberty Amendment to the Constitution to abolish the income and death taxes. And he will be proud to be the one who finally turns off the lights at the IRS for good.

Capital gains taxes, which punish you for success (and interfere with your efforts to hedge against inflation by purchasing gold and silver coins), should also be immediately repealed.

Struggling college students and those working to support their families would be greatly benefited and receive an immediate pay raise by eliminating taxes on tips.

As a congressman, Ron Paul has consistently endorsed legislation to let Americans claim more tax credits and deductions, including on educational costs, alternative energy vehicles, and health care. He also believes it is immoral to tax senior citizens twice by requiring them to include Social Security benefits in their gross income at tax time. A first step to eliminating that requirement would be to repeal the 1993 increase in taxes on Social Security benefits. Then we must abolish that tax entirely.

While a Flat Tax or a Fair Tax would each be a better alternative to the income tax system, Congressman Paul believes we would have to guarantee the 16th Amendment is repealed to avoid having both the income tax and one of these systems as an additional tax.

But there is a better way. Restraining federal spending by enforcing the Constitution’s strict limits on the federal government’s power would help result in a 0% income tax rate for Americans.

The answer to spending and debt is to return to a constitutionally limited government that protects liberty – not one that keeps robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Chris Rock: "I'll Pay Higher Taxes."

I agree with Chris Rock, they (rich people) can afford higher taxes, because of the fact if they make more than 500,000 dollars a year, paying $185,000 sounds fair. Because when I was working and bringing in $1000 dollars net per week, I would see maybe $750 for a 40 hour week. It makes no sense, having a Country in Debt Trillions of Dollars, but we still believe in not taxing the wealthiest who live here.

Wow... This Is An amazing Story

If Poles are shifting, it is Going to Effect Everything

Instead of thwarting my own head up against the wall, I felt compelled to write something to even boggle the wisest mind.  This is the script that was produced by none other than Oh Zee, again giving you his words of wisdom.

There is a predominant thought that seems to be constricting everyone's ability, most of you probably already know what I am not about to say.  It draws a great connection to what many modern astronomer's believe will be a cataclysmic pole-shift, they could be wrong however is this something to take lightly?  These thoughts in my mind were suddenly blocked and I was able to "envision" the aftershock of this particular, "end of the world."

If and when the Earth's poles shift, like these Astronomer's have suggested, the result of it would do everything except "end the world."  Let's take these words "Pole Shift," literal. Now apply it's exact meaning to your perspective as I have, and this should be well known because it goes back to the Physical ideals that started the science.  Magnetic pull, as well as Gravity show us everything about we could possibly need to know.  Poles are always being pulled, eventually pull is going to come from the opposite direction.  What goes up, must come down.

Recently I have joined with the theories behind quantum physics, they bound us all together as one giant electromagnetic frequency field, because everything is a combination of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Three elementary atoms, give us our perception on Reality.  Well what is Real?  Is the Bible Real to you?  If so, you also believe this to a sense, because GOD is everywhere and is within everything, right?  So in this field of energy, there are only protons and electrons, (neutrons is not charged)this is the crucial truth.  Just as their are good (+), and evil (-) people, there are also people with a positive outlook on life, and some who are overly pessimistic.  December 21, 2012 will reverse everything we see, touch, smell, and hear.

If this pole shift occurs, does that mean the people who have struggled in poverty, will soon become very wealthy?  Or people with bad luck, will soon be bombarded with good fortune?  I see how balanced the world is with negative and positive energy, if that balance is to continue then we should start getting prepared for the tides to turn.  What will we do if time starts going in reverse?  What about gravity, will it to be reversed?  There is a limitless amount of possibilites as to what will actually transpire, but this theory of mine gives me a reason to smile, because I will grow taller, and watch the Tall ones become short.  Point and laugh at the skinny people that quickly reach obesity.  The old become young, and the trees become roots.

Stockton, Stand By, Let Me fix this Problem

  Everything that has ever been created, started with an idea, the difference is just the Scale of the project.  If my generation had any idea what we are about to embark on, they would just continually ask questions, which couldn't pertain to these conversations about MONEY!

  Not that I am Under-educated in the field of economics, but didn't attend Yale Business School, or any other fancy institution, my knowledge should still not be under estimated.  I intend to Revolutionize this Economy, and get it back on track.  I use the phase "I" to represent that, until the Incorporation Of Oh Zee Clothing occurs, it is solely on my shoulders.  It's not my responsibility, I know.  However I watched two-years from the sidelines, and realized every day that goes by in which I don't better the community, I am losing my ability to Call the Shots.  That doesn't mean I can't.  The Opportunity here has never been this great, Invest....SOON!!!   

   In the next few weeks, Me and Three Colleagues take the Leap into the Corporate world with nothing to lose.  Time will no longer be of the essence, instead of being wasted, let's invest what we can.  For some the desire of having it all, but not willing to invest time to expand their creativity, to ensure they get it all.  We are the type that will walk out of a meeting that started 30 seconds ago, because you advertantly question a fact.  A fact, can NEVER be found to be False...

   So when A businessman offers you a job, you are ever so desperately in need of, thank Oh Zee, because we Don't allow questions, NEXT!  You lost your one shot...