Senate Shows Obama, to back away from the GUN!

By Chris Moody & Rachel Rose Hartman | The Ticket


A bipartisan gun control deal by Toomey and Manchin inspired Senate conservatives to drop their filibuster plans, even though many Republicans who allowed the legislation to advance said they were unlikely to vote for its passage in the end. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

The Senate on Wednesday rejected a bipartisan amendment that would have expanded background checks on gun purchases, a blow to advocates calling for more strict firearm laws after the mass shootings in Newtown, Conn., late last year.

The measure, the product of intense negotiations between Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Pat Toomey and West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, would have extended background check requirements on gun owners. It needed 60 votes to pass, but failed 54-46.

Democrats voting against the amendment were Mark Begich of Alaska, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Max Baucus of Montana. (Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada switched his vote to no at the end, a procedural tactic that allows him to bring it up for a vote later.) In addition to Toomey, Republicans who supported the amendment were Sens. Mark Kirk of Illinois, Susan Collins of Maine and John McCain of Arizona.

Scores of onlookers filled the Senate gallery to watch the vote. When Vice President Joseph Biden read the final tally and announced the amendment had not passed, Patricia Maisch, who helped disarm the man who shot former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, yelled, "Shame on you!" before walking out of the chamber.

To finish reading this story, click here!



Obama even sends out some elbows in the direction of the republican Senators who stood up and defend our freedom!

An able minded Response to Vice President Joe Biden's comments on gun control; He's GUILTY!

DANVILLE, KY - OCTOBER 11: U.S. Vice President Joe Biden speaks during the vice presidential debate at Centre College October 11, 2012 in Danville, Kentucky. This is the second of four debates during the presidential election season and the only debate between the vice presidential candidates before the closely-contested election November 6. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Photo: Alex Wong, Getty Images

Is Joe Biden dyslexic, or can he not read english? Because he's missing a common fundamental about our constitutional right to bear arms. Doesn't he know the FBI, CIA, and DHS have reported that Americans have been buying so many guns, that stores are running out, and some have sold out. Plus several manufacturers have gun shops on back-order. Not to mention nearly 85% of Americans favor no new restrictions on any type of guns (when they poll in larger test groups).

According to the VP's speech on limiting the rights of gun owners, if he believes that the majority of Americans are in agreement with their plan to make more regulations that will further restrict law abiding citizens from owning guns, specifically, but not limited to "Assault Weapons."

I am going to write a writ of mandate against Obama, Biden, Feinstein, and any others who enact any type of altercation to the second amendment of our constitution, based on the fact it states that:

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

What this explains is that each state should have a well regulated militia to protect its people from a rogue federal government, or coup. This militia can be made up of concerned citizens, who are using their right to bear arms to protect their freedom, as well as the rest of their rights. Also it is allowing the states to refuse any federal weapons ban, due to the fact that the constitution in this great country holds supremacy to any type of new statute or law being imposed, and the last part states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. This means what it says, it doesn't imply anything about hunting, or "sportsmen," nor does it give the President, Congress, or any other branch of government any jurisdiction to amend or even discuss even the slightest modification to the second amendment right of any sort.

Infringed is defined as:
1. To actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright".
2. To act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: "infringe on his privacy".

This means that Joe Biden and Barack Obama, have already committed Userption, which is trying to manipulate the masses to deprive us of our constitutional rights, which were endowed by our creator. Being the President, Vice President, Senator, or Congressman and being guilty of this act is also guilty of Treason, based solely on the fact that they are not upholding their oath of office, because it states nothing about saving the children of America anywhere in the Oath of office.

My last warning to America is the reason for the use of the name "assault Weapons," which can eventually be interpreted as all guns, that has a purpose of being used as means to assault someone, which all guns do. It is so vague, given that it is a hot subject as of late, so be ready when in a few more years to stand up and fight for our rights! They want us to have less firepower than them, because they are worried of a revolution now that they have crossed the line.

This is a subject I care deeply about, as I am a legal scholar, and I had taken this pledge when I ran for Mayor last year, swearing to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States from terrorists both foreign and domestic.

America, please do not trust anything stated by this tyrannical coup a.k.a. "The Obama Administration," they are using the media to divert the citizens from our god given rights.

P.S. Remember the holocaust happened after they disarmed the jews. It is our choice whether we choose to LIVE FREE or DIE HARD!

here are some good images that explain my reasoning in short.