To my fellow Voter,
Whether or not you like "comments" stated by President Donald J. Trump, in his call with the President of the Ukraine, he never asked for dirt on
Joe Biden, He was talking about Hunter Biden, and the corruption in a gas and oil company ran by one of the most corrupt men in all of Europe. Shouldn't we get a testimony from this guy? Either the owner of
Burisma, or the other Board Members will suffice. Because, now this impeachment story really comes down to whether or not the president's supposedly "debunked" theory about Hunter Biden's alleged corruption was factually predicated.
If their was known corruption, and backed by court ruling, bank statements, and written and sworn affidavit's of such, why are the top broadcasting "News" Corporations investigating this? Until a real investigation, done by a special counsel on this alleged corruption has been completed, their is no basis for any alleged wrongdoing by the president.
In a rough shod hope at impeachment, with no fact based evidence, one fact witness Ambassador to the Ukraine, Gordon Sondland who gave exculpatory evidence of a direct quote from the President, "I want Nothing from Ukraine,Nothing." President Trump, in contrast with the Democrats theories, and the rest of the witnesses only provide hearsay that they may have thought, or interpreted (conjectured assumptions) which if used will be only the second attempted coup in this Nations History. The first known attempt was the top democrat's who plotted the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, in 1864. They were eventually found Guilty of Treason and publicly hung in Washington D.C. The precedence is not at all in their favor here. Why Continue down a path that will undoubtedly lead them to gallows?
The truth of the matter is this simple; There are 4 people talikng about what 6 people told them that they heard from 10 sources, none of whom were actually listening in on the call on July 25th. However, the Main stream Media outlets have to this point contorted these testimonies and labeled assumptions and presumptions as factual evidence. All is speculation, which cannot be used as evidence in any court, and will not pass being noticed by the senate, nor the Supreme Court, not even remotely close to a 0.0000001% chance of success. So Is this all just a big smear tactic, which "Nervous" Nancy Pelosi and coup comrades "Shifty" Adam Schiff both are Democratic Representatives from California.
Both
CNN, and FOX NEWS provide the transcript for all to read, lo and behold, both are the same, so the contents of the call are not in dispute, so where did Schiff get his parody idea, and why did he use it in his report of their sham investigation? Because it's a Power Grab, as a last ditch effort to remove the president of the United States.
Schiff gets my award for the biggest Gaslighting of 2019 when he stated his own Parody version of the call in question. Hereis Trump's statement, as well so we can compare the Apple to the orange ourselves:
Schiff's version:
Now compare this to the actual Transcript of the Call, documented by two stenographers and two translators, who have confirmed that these were 100% accurate:
The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible.
President Zelenskyy responds.
President Trump: "Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
A funny interpretation is Schiff's version said, Do Not Call me though, I will call you, when you have done what I asked."
when the transcript which is not disputed says that President Trump actually said, "
Whenever you would like to come to the White House, feel free to call. Give us a date and we'll work that out. I look forward to seeing you."
These two statements couldn't be further from eachother if either one of them had thrown in the word 'zebra.'
The best way I have read anyone putting this into context is this quote from John Hinderaker, a fellow blogger at
POWERLINEblog.com, who stated this:
Apart from the fact that it shows once again what a disgusting liar Adam Schiff is, why is his “parody” important? Because it shows the baselessness of the Democrats’ case against Trump. If Trump had actually said anything objectionable–let alone impeachable!–in his conversation with Zelensky, Schiff would have quoted it. But because the conversation was entirely innocent, Schiff couldn’t quote a line of it. He had to make schiff up, and that’s what he did.
My favorite statement in the transcript is when President Zelensky said, "Well yes, to tell you the truth, we are trying to work hard because we wanted to
drain the swamp here in our country. We brought in many many new people. Not the old politicians, not the typical politicians, because we want to have a new format and a new type of government. You are a great teacher for us and in that."
The next thing Zelenskyy said to President Trump was evidence that he has a strong global network of support:
President Zelenskyy: "Yes you are absolutely right. Not only 100%, but actually 1000%"
In my own opinion it hurts CNN's credibility bigly, when they make statements like such, "President Donald Trump repeatedly pushed for Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter, during a July 25 phone call."
In this subtext before revealing to you the text from
the transcript, they left out the key points of what exactly the President Trump asking them to investigate the former VP Biden and his Son Hunter for? Corruption.
Maybe they're really hiding something extremely horrific from reaching the American population that will ruin their quest for total domination and the timely submission of the Citizenry at large. The 'normie news' continues to attack this POTUS 92% of the coverage is used to tear him down. Are these talking heads really that far removed from reality? He is putting ALL AMERICANS FIRST, as an american citizen young or old, how can you be against your own best interest being taken as priority? And God forbid you are a parent and you want to remove the one politician who is actually giving our children the opportunity to live in the last country on earth that has true freedom.
Greg Pitsch for CA Senator
