This Is Port City: Stockton's Mayor suffers from Amnesia due to her H...

This Is Port City: Stockton's Mayor suffers from Amnesia due to her H...: Does Ann Johnston have something to hide? She can work how many hours aside from her Mayor's duty? The correct answer is 0, because Stoc...

Mitt Romney caught on "hidden camera"

Atta Boy Mitt!!

Lindsey Williams - The Elites Plans - Oct 21 2010 - part 5/6

Lindsey Williams - The Elites Plans - Oct 21 2010 - part 5/6




Watch Richard Gage's 2 hr presentation "9/11: Blueprint for Truth" using the scientific method to show that the 3 WTC towers could NOT have collapsed straight down at near free fall speed because of fires or structural damage. IF YOU ARE A SKEPTIC, THEN THIS VIDEO IS A MUST WATCH.

http://researchris.blogspot.com
http://freedomwatchonfox.com/
http://infowars.com

" To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 collapses of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer. "

READ and DOWNLOAD REPUBLIC MAGAZINES now for FREE
http://readrepublicmag.blogspot.com/

Obama's Eligibility Still in Question

Evens the “ch’mos” who were in Fort Leavenworth with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, the military physician who was court-martialed for refusing orders because he could not get confirmed Barack Obama’s eligibility to be commander in chief, recognized that Obama’s release of a Hawaiian birth document last year didn’t resolve the question.

That’s according to Lakin’s new book, “Officer’s Oath: Why my Vow to Defend the Constitution Demanded that I Sacrifice my Career.”

The just-released book explains what happened in his case, and more significantly, why.

The officer had served with distinction, but decided that based on the available information, he had questions about whether Obama is eligible to be commander-in-chief of the U.S. military and order soldiers into war.

He had tried for years to obtain confirmation through the channels inside the military, through his congressional representatives, and other available channels, to no avail.

So he decided that his oath of allegiance to the Constitution required him to refuse an order from the chain of command headed by Obama. That would, he thought, force the issue, and possibly get an answer.

He got an answer, but not to the question: He was court-martialed and removed from the military. He now has joined a civilian physicians’ practice where he sees patients daily.

Get the book about the officer who challenged Obama now, in Terry Lakin’s “Officer’s Oath.”

In his book, he relates that he was in Leavenworth serving what amounted to a 5-month sentence when Obama released the document he represented as a copy of his original Hawaiian birth documentation.

That’s the document that Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigators have concluded likely is a forgery.

But other prisoners called his attention to the news report about Obama’s action and comments, and then asked him.

“One question, Terry.”

“Shoot.”

“All you were asking for was a birth certificate, correct? If Obama had nothing to hide, how come he didn’t release it a long time ago?”

“I guess what they say is right: no one knows a con job better than a convict,” Lakin wrote.

He addresses his case in chapters titled, “Of Paramount Importance,” “The Truth Matters,” “Doing What is Right,” “Crossing the line,” “Duty, Honor, Country,” and “Walking Righteous.”

The episode with the question from one of the “ch’mos,” (child molesters) comes in the chapter titled 27 April 2011, the date Obama released the document and posted it on the White House website.

Lakin notes that Obama claimed to have “had every official in Hawaii … confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii.”

“‘Every official in Hawaii’? I guess the president did not consult with Tim Adams. During the 2008 election cycle Adams served as senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu,” Lakin wrote.

Adams stated that, “There is no hospital record of his birth in Honolulu … and the Hawaii Department of Health told us in the Elections Office that there was no birth certificate.”

To read the rest, Click here!

Rand Paul Calls for Political Reform After Health Law Ruling

QUOTED: Rand Paul Ky


“Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional,” - Rand Paul

Rand Paul Rips Romney for Saying He Could Fight Iran Without Congress

JUN 20 2012, 10:45 AM ET 62
Though he has endorsed the presumptive GOP nominee, the senator took to National Review Online to assert Congress's role in declaring war.


After Senator Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney, he got grief from a lot of his libertarian supporters, especially after the GOP nominee stated that the president can wage war on Iran without Congressional approval. Anyone wondering how Sen. Paul would react, as I've been doing, need wait no longer. In a piece published Tuesday afternoon at National Review Online, he reiterated his dissatisfaction with President Obama's domestic agenda, and then proceeded to write:

... I must oppose the most recent statements made by Mitt Romney in which he says he, as president, could take us to war unilaterally with Iran, without any approval from Congress.

This is a misreading of the role of the president and Congress in declaring war. The Constitution clearly states that it is Congress that has the power to declare war, not the president. The War Powers Act also clearly states that U.S. forces are to engage in hostilities only if the circumstances are "pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

Absent these criteria, the president has no authority to declare war. Even if the president believes he has such authority, the War Powers Act goes on to require the president to seek congressional approval within 60 days of conflict. No president is above the law or above the Constitution.
Paul criticized the Obama Administration's foreign policy too:

President Obama was elected on a platform of ending wars, yet he has opposed every effort made by me and others in the Senate to do that. He opposed my resolution to end the Iraq War. He has refused my urgings to end the war in Afghanistan more quickly. He started another war in Libya, and this time went further into unconstitutional territory than previous presidents by not even seeking Congressional approval whatsoever. I opposed him when he did that. Anyone who believes President Obama is less aggressive internationally than his predecessors is mistaken. I do not yet know if I will find a Romney presidency more acceptable on foreign policy.

As interesting as the piece itself is its venue, National Review Online's group blog, The Corner, which isn't generally friendly to non-interventionists. The comments beneath the post were as heated as you'd expect.